I just finished reading this 1917 essay by Russian Formalist critic
Victor Shklovsky (that picture on wikipedia is the sweetest thing...).
Shklovsky coined the notion of "defamiliarization"in poetry and prose:
"The technique of art is to make objects 'unfamiliar,' to make forms difficult, to increase the difficulty and length of perception because the process of perception is an aesthetic end in itself and must be prolonged. Art is a way of experiencing the artfulness of an object; the object is not important."
Whew. Alright Shklovsky.
What's awesome about this essay is it points out how art can make us stop and see something for the first time. It sounds a lil hippie-dippy, but it can make us take an accepted practice and see its absurdity, or see a pencil as a foreign and fascinating object.
Reading this, makes it click, for me, why a particular piece of work stays with me. Why I feel shifted when I walk away from a particularly powerful play, short story, film, etc. It made me take in the "stony-ness of the stone."
Okay.
So.
What does this mean for the work? How can this be applied to playwriting???
Well, an entire play can be an act of defamiliarization. It seems to me Shklovsky focuses on moments of the unfamiliar in fiction, but I think a whole play can exhibit this theory. Juxtaposition, pulling something out of its normal environment, collage, hybrid--all of these techniques can cause the audience to see it new. We can recognize the typical American living room, but what happens when we see two men gutting fish on the couch? (that's a poor example, but you know what I mean).
So.
I think this essay is useful in the sense that it reminds me to think about how to push something to the next level. And that kind of thinking is never a bad thing....not yet anyway.